Talk:Dominion War: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I do like the sound of Dominion War, defines more clear bounds for the fight. Sure, there was the solar war over like siege stations or whatever, but '''Dominion War''' just ''screams'' "arms race" imo. <span style="color:#aa00aa;">'''||'''</span> <span style="color:#7ec3de;">'''17/9/26'''</span> [[User:Bronze|Bronze]] ([[User_talk:Bronze|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bronze|Contribs]]) | I do like the sound of Dominion War, defines more clear bounds for the fight. Sure, there was the solar war over like siege stations or whatever, but '''Dominion War''' just ''screams'' "arms race" imo. <span style="color:#aa00aa;">'''||'''</span> <span style="color:#7ec3de;">'''17/9/26'''</span> [[User:Bronze|Bronze]] ([[User_talk:Bronze|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bronze|Contribs]]) | ||
What do you mean technical victory? It’s phyrrhic. Kingsheep3 | What do you mean technical victory? It’s phyrrhic. Kingsheep3, elaborate please as to why it was changed. It would be a phyrrhic victory due to the fact the CTF DID loose all ships, however successfully captured the station. | ||
A Phyrric victory is one that "comes at such high cost to the victor that it is tantamount to defeat". While CTF lost all ships, it was only 2 t1 gs (basically free) and 2 t1 frig (hardly expensive), a total which i wouldn't consider to be "tantamount to defeat", especially when compared to the fact it bought them a siege station, which at least in my eyes is a overall gain. I changed it to technical as while CTF was defeated militarily, it still managed to win the objective of the battle, meaning that while the CTF did lose militarily it still "technically" was victorious. - Deuterium | |||
Alright that’s fair, thank you deuterium. Kingsheep3 | |||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 25 September 2026
we are absolutely not naming it this we gotta call it something actually cool. I suggested Dominion War a while back (NebulousHarmony | Contribs)
this page only exists because kingsheep wanted to write about the qatra fight as evident by the complete lack of effort put into anything else on it (Jak | Contribs)
Wow, this page is... Pointless?? Vega/LS are always at war, what does this prove :sob: I don't even know if you could call this an extension of the LS-FORSEQ war, because Vega and LS were already AT WAR?? (Bronze | Contribs)
its not pointless its literally an ongoing war you ****** -Kingsheep3
its a continuation of the fortuna-ls war anyway pretty much -Kingsheep3
Also kora, either way it’s a major chain of events, more activity then the conflicts after solar war. -Kingsheep3
ill ad new wkikpages parts when im on a smaller evice, my laptops keyboar dis ebeing weir -Kingsheep3
griff i dk how to put infoboxes in specific places -Sheep
drag and drop or edit source and move from timbuk tu to the top of the page -Griff
Also I won't disagree that the original name was semi-pointless given that LS/VEGA wars have been more or less ongoing since like LS rose out of whatever alliance it was? Just hotter at times and colder at others. Functional Temp-name but neb raised good points. -Griff
I do like the sound of Dominion War, defines more clear bounds for the fight. Sure, there was the solar war over like siege stations or whatever, but Dominion War just screams "arms race" imo. || 17/9/26 Bronze (Talk | Contribs)
What do you mean technical victory? It’s phyrrhic. Kingsheep3, elaborate please as to why it was changed. It would be a phyrrhic victory due to the fact the CTF DID loose all ships, however successfully captured the station.
A Phyrric victory is one that "comes at such high cost to the victor that it is tantamount to defeat". While CTF lost all ships, it was only 2 t1 gs (basically free) and 2 t1 frig (hardly expensive), a total which i wouldn't consider to be "tantamount to defeat", especially when compared to the fact it bought them a siege station, which at least in my eyes is a overall gain. I changed it to technical as while CTF was defeated militarily, it still managed to win the objective of the battle, meaning that while the CTF did lose militarily it still "technically" was victorious. - Deuterium Alright that’s fair, thank you deuterium. Kingsheep3