Talk:Recon Starfighter: Difference between revisions
Appearance
And here, I say, I defend my recon starfighter. To call it a fighter is a disgrace. |
Kingsheep3 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(rant) Okay, yes, *technically*, the display name for RECON_STARFIGHTER is Recon Fighter... HOWEVER! It's RECON_STARFIGHTER because it's RECON_STARFIGHTER in the code, it's a subclass of Starfighter (You don't call LCR Logistics Cruise), I'm the one scanning the code for all of this, and it's scrambler starfighter / scrambler, NEVER scrambler fighter. Plus, recon doesn't even FIGHT! Why would it EVER be called fighter?? [[User:Bronze|Bronze]] ([[User_talk:Bronze|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bronze|Contributions]]) | (rant) Okay, yes, *technically*, the display name for RECON_STARFIGHTER is Recon Fighter... HOWEVER! It's RECON_STARFIGHTER because it's RECON_STARFIGHTER in the code, it's a subclass of Starfighter (You don't call LCR Logistics Cruise), I'm the one scanning the code for all of this, and it's scrambler starfighter / scrambler, NEVER scrambler fighter. Plus, recon doesn't even FIGHT! Why would it EVER be called fighter?? [[User:Bronze|Bronze]] ([[User_talk:Bronze|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Bronze|Contributions]]) | ||
its now called a recon craft | |||
Latest revision as of 08:31, 16 September 2026
(rant) Okay, yes, *technically*, the display name for RECON_STARFIGHTER is Recon Fighter... HOWEVER! It's RECON_STARFIGHTER because it's RECON_STARFIGHTER in the code, it's a subclass of Starfighter (You don't call LCR Logistics Cruise), I'm the one scanning the code for all of this, and it's scrambler starfighter / scrambler, NEVER scrambler fighter. Plus, recon doesn't even FIGHT! Why would it EVER be called fighter?? Bronze (Talk | Contributions)
its now called a recon craft